Taxonomy / Customary pluralism / Tying the standard to the situation rather than the group

Tying the standard to the situation rather than the group

This line holds that the unit the partition runs on is the situation, not the community: people do not consult a rule book but complete a pattern, answering 'what does someone like me do in a case like this?', which yields a mosaic of context-bound standards that are never written down and never merged into one. The design consequence is that a system should carry standards indexed to circumstance rather than one ranked set, and that the mosaic is what an AI has to fit into rather than a mess to be tidied. A large-scale readout of one deployed model's expressed values across real usage bears the claim out from the other direction, finding thousands of distinct values whose appearance turns on what is being asked rather than a single value set. What is offered here is not a way of separating groups but a refusal to flatten circumstances.

The method, against Customary pluralism

Scroll the diagram sideways to see all of it.

Also places in

  • Convention equilibrium — The same pattern-completion mechanism that yields a mosaic of context-specific standards also explains how one population settles on a single convention and keeps it — the theory covers the collapse case as the special case where the contexts coincide.

Counts and the concept reading below use the primary regime only.

Concept Analysis: Theoretical Foundations

Each concept is read twice: whether the approach carries it, and whether the approach's own sources claim it. A concept that is absent and was never claimed is a gap in the field rather than a failure of the work, and is marked out of scope.

Prescription

PartialClaimed · partial

Definition · Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

Long usage itself confers authority: a practice that has organized life for generations carries compressed, tested wisdom, even when nobody can articulate its justification.

Analysis

The theory's core mechanism is Burke's, restated: an actor completes an inherited pattern — what does someone like me do in a situation like this — without being able to articulate why, and the pattern works because it has been shaped by long use. What is deliberately withheld is Burke's normative step. The account explains why unarticulated standards are sticky; it never says that stickiness earns them deference, and it insists their content is arbitrary.

The unwritten constitution

PresentClaimed · delivered

Definition · A. V. Dicey, Law of the Constitution (1885)

Some of a country's most binding norms are never written anywhere — the UK's constitutional conventions bind governments without a single codified sentence. Binding and codified are different properties.

Analysis

This is the whole subject: standards that bind behavior, are backed by social sanction, vary by context and are written down nowhere. Dicey's distinction between binding and codified is the theory's organizing claim rather than an implication of it.

Organic amendment

PartialClaimed · partial

Definition · Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

Norms change from within a community's practice — gradually, by adjustment — not by decree from outside. The community is the author of its own drift.

Analysis

Dynamism is one of the five features the theory sets out to explain, and it locates change inside the practice: standards shift as the patterns people complete shift, with no decree from outside. Burke's other half is missing — there is no community authoring its own drift here, only a population whose distribution moves. Change is endogenous but unowned.

Concept Analysis: Newly Introduced

Norms without a normative claim

Added

Burke defends inherited practice; this theory explains it and expressly declines to defend it, holding the content of norms to be arbitrary. The result is an account that predicts what a population will treat as appropriate while denying that being treated as appropriate makes anything so — a separation the tradition it borrows from does not permit.

Papers

No method has been built here yet — this approach rests entirely on what follows.