Taxonomy / Character alignment / Training a character into the weights

Training a character into the weights

Author a set of traits — honesty, care, curiosity, or whatever persona is wanted — and bake them in during training with synthetic self-dialogue and constitutional-style fine-tuning, so behavior follows from what the model is like rather than from a rule it consults at answer time. The open replication makes the limit plain: the same pipeline installs eleven different personas, including a deliberately malevolent one, so the technique settles how a character gets in, never which character it should be. The evaluations filed here ask the question this strategy stands or falls on — whether the installed disposition is one thing at all: does a model give the same value-laden answer after a reword, a topic shift, a format change and a translation, and what moral profile actually ended up encoded across twenty-eight models nobody character-trained on purpose.

The method, against Character alignment

Scroll the diagram sideways to see all of it.

Concept Analysis: Theoretical Foundations

Each concept is read twice: whether the approach carries it, and whether the approach's own sources claim it. A concept that is absent and was never claimed is a gap in the field rather than a failure of the work, and is marked out of scope.

Hexis: Trained Disposition

PresentClaimed · delivered

Definition · Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

This concept states that virtue is a stable trait of character, formed through practice rather than consulted as a rule. An honest person does not check a rule before declining to lie; honesty is part of what they are.

Analysis

Training does produce stable dispositions. The model behaves honestly because of how it was trained, with no rule consulted at the time of the answer, which is the closest correspondence to hexis among the approaches here.

Phronesis: Practical Wisdom

AbsentClaimed · unmet

Definition · Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

This is the learned capacity to judge what a particular situation calls for, and it does the work when two virtues conflict, e.g., when honesty calls for plain speech and kindness for a softer answer. For Aristotle, a disposition without this judgment does not count as virtue.

Analysis

When the trained virtues conflict, e.g., when honesty calls for a blunt answer and care for a gentler one, the model settles the conflict somewhere inside its weights, and the resolution is generally neither stated nor inspectable. For Aristotle this judging capacity is not an optional addition, since a disposition without it does not count as virtue. The training builds the disposition and leaves the judgment unaccounted for.

Ethismos: Habituation

PartialClaimed · partial

Definition · Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics

This is the process by which character is formed, through repeated practice under a deliberately designed course of training: one becomes just by performing just acts. It is a method of moral formation rather than a side effect of some other process.

Analysis

Training is a form of habituation, in that repetition shapes the disposition. However, it is generally not designed as moral formation, and the character emerges as one product of a broad training process whose data serves many purposes at once.

The Exemplar

AbsentNot claimed · out of scope

Definition · Linda Zagzebski, Exemplarist Moral Theory (2017)

This theory grounds ethics in admirable persons rather than in principles. The exemplar is identified first, and what counts as excellence is then fixed by reference to that person, in the way a unit of measurement is fixed by a reference object.

Analysis

No exemplar anchors the character. The disposition is shaped by training objectives and data rather than by reference to a particular admirable person.

Papers

Argued for, not built

These make the case for this approach, or sketch a design for it, but leave nothing built and tested behind.